Monday, 4 July 2016

EU the Hydra has "many"heads;

Why The British Said No To Europe
By John Pilger

June 26, 2016 "
Information Clearing House" - The majority vote by Britons to leave the European Union was an act of raw democracy. Millions of ordinary people refused to be bullied, intimidated and dismissed with open contempt by their presumed betters in the major parties, the leaders of the business and banking oligarchy and the media. This was, in great part, a vote by those angered and demoralised by the sheer arrogance of the apologists for the "remain" campaign and the dismemberment of a socially just civil life in Britain. The last bastion of the historic reforms of 1945, the National Health Service, has been so subverted by Tory and Labour-supported privateers it is fighting for its life. 
A forewarning came when the Treasurer, George Osborne, the embodiment of both Britain's ancient regime and the banking mafia in Europe, threatened to cut £30 billion from public services if people voted the wrong way; it was blackmail on a shocking scale.
Immigration was exploited in the campaign with consummate cynicism, not only by populist politicians from the lunar right but by Labour politicians drawing on their own venerable tradition of promoting and nurturing racism, a symptom of corruption not at the bottom but at the top. The reason millions of refugees have fled the Middle East - first Iraq, now Syria - are the invasions and imperial mayhem of Britain, the United States, France, the European Union and Nato. Before that, there was the wilful destruction of Yugoslavia. Before that, there was the theft of Palestine and the imposition of Israel.
The pith helmets may have long gone, but the blood has never dried. A nineteenth-century contempt for countries and peoples, depending on their degree of colonial usefulness, remains a centrepiece of modern "globalisation", with its perverse socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor: its freedom for capital and denial of freedom to labour; its perfidious politicians and politicised civil servants.
All this has now come home to Europe, enriching the likes of Tony Blair and impoverishing and disempowering millions. On 23 June, the British said no more.
The most effective propagandists of the "European ideal" have not been the far right, but an insufferably patrician class for whom metropolitan London is the United Kingdom. Its leading members see themselves as liberal, enlightened, cultivated tribunes of the 21st-century zeitgeist, even "cool". What they really are is a bourgeoisie with insatiable consumerist tastes and ancient instincts of their own superiority. In their house paper, the Guardian, they have gloated, day after day, at those who would even consider the EU profoundly undemocratic, a source of social injustice and a virulent extremism known as "neoliberalism".
The aim of this extremism is to install a permanent, capitalist theocracy that ensures a two-thirds society, with the majority divided and indebted, managed by a corporate class, and a permanent working poor. In Britain today, 63 percent of poor children grow up in families where one member is working. For them, the trap has closed. More than 600,000 residents of Britain's second city, Greater Manchester, are, reports a study, "experiencing the effects of extreme poverty" and 1.6 million are slipping into penury.
Little of this social catastrophe is acknowledged in the bourgeois controlled media, notably the Oxbridge dominated BBC. During the referendum campaign, almost no insightful analysis was allowed to intrude upon the clichéd hysteria about "leaving Europe", as if Britain was about to be towed in hostile currents somewhere north of Iceland.
On the morning after the vote, a BBC radio reporter welcomed politicians to his studio as old chums. "Well," he said to "Lord" Peter Mandelson, the disgraced architect of Blairism, "why do these people want it so badly?" The "these people" are the majority of Britons.
The wealthy war criminal Tony Blair remains a hero of the Mandelson "European" class, though few will say so these days. The Guardian once described Blair as "mystical" and has been true to his "project" of rapacious war.  The day after the vote, the columnist Martin Kettle offered a Brechtian solution to the misuse of democracy by the masses. "Now surely we can agree referendums are bad for Britain", said the headline over his full-page piece. The "we" was unexplained but understood - just as "these people" is understood. "The referendum has conferred less legitimacy on politics, not more," wrote Kettle. " ... the verdict on referendums should be a ruthless one. Never again."
The kind of ruthlessness Kettle longs for is found in Greece, a country now airbrushed. There, they had a referendum and the result was ignored.  Like the Labour Party in Britain, the leaders of the Syriza government in Athens are the products of an affluent, highly privileged, educated middle class, groomed in the fakery and political treachery of post-modernism. The Greek people courageously used the referendum to demand their government sought "better terms" with a venal status quo in Brussels that was crushing the life out of their country. They were betrayed, as the British would have been betrayed.
On Friday, the Labour Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, was asked by the BBC if he would pay tribute to the departed Cameron, his comrade in the "remain" campaign. Corbyn fulsomely praised Cameron's "dignity" and noted his backing for gay marriage and his apology to the Irish families of the dead of Bloody Sunday. He said nothing about Cameron's divisiveness, his brutal austerity policies, his lies about "protecting" the Health Service. Neither did he remind people of the war mongering of the Cameron government: the dispatch of British special forces to Libya and British bomb aimers to Saudi Arabia and, above all, the beckoning of world war three.
In the week of the referendum vote, no British politician and, to my knowledge, no journalist referred to Vladimir Putin's speech in St. Petersburg commemorating the seventy-fifth anniversary of Nazi Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union on 22 June 1941. The Soviet victory - at a cost of 27 million Soviet lives and the majority of all German forces - won the Second World War.
Putin likened the current frenzied build-up of Nato troops and war material on Russia's western borders to the Third Reich's Operation Barbarossa. Nato's exercises in Poland were the biggest since the Nazi invasion; Operation Anaconda had simulated an attack on Russia, presumably with nuclear weapons. On the eve of the referendum, the quisling secretary-general of Nato, Jens Stoltenberg, warned Britons they would be endangering "peace and security" if they voted to leave the EU. The millions who ignored him and Cameron, Osborne, Corbyn, Obama and the man who runs the Bank of England may, just may, have struck a blow for real peace and democracy in Europe.
Follow John Pilger on twitter @johnpilger and on Facebook 

John Pilger one of the true blue Journalists,
Photo/courtesy Davide Bonazzi com.


  1. Not siding any party but majority votes is very unpredictable.

    1. Yes, but the vote is all so called Democracy has, and even this is taken away by changing and manipulating. France has the biggest revolution since 200 years now, because of EU wanting to change their labour laws. France never takes it laying down. Their leaders are highly corrupt like most of all politicians which do not work for their own country and people anymore. They are now the facilitators for Global Oligarchy/Corporacy. Democracy has become more or less a farce. People in Europe have fought for democracy, a decent life,for hundreds of years and now it seems they are losing it again.

  2. Etwas mehr darauf eingehen, was die einfachen Menschen bewegt, täte der EU gut. Im Moment zählen mehr die Konzerninteressen, so macht es den Eindruck. Jetzt sagen gewisse Politiker schon, die Leute sind zu dumm für die direkte Demokratie, und fordern weniger Demokratie für die EU statt mehr. Wo das noch hinführt?

    Den Artikel habe ich gelesen, wegen den eher weniger guten Englischkenntnissen jedoch nicht alles Wort für Wort verstanden, dem Sinn nach wahrscheinlich schon. Gut gefallen hat mir der Ausdruck: with its perverse socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor: Erstaunlich das viele Geld das für die Rüstungsindustrie zur Verfügung steht, und es wird immer mehr aufgerüstet auf allen Seiten. Es sieht so aus als ob gewisse Kreise sich einen grossen Krieg wünschen, ausbaden müsste es wieder die Menschen in Europa, die sogenannten "neoliberalen" Kräfte allüberall haben sich für diesen Fall bestimmt schon ungefährliche Zufluchtsorte gesichert, man hört von Südamerika, Neuseeland ...

    Wie das alles für die Schweiz als so kleines Land ausgeht, ist fraglich. Mir als älterem Mensch ist das alles nicht egal, aber ehrlich gesagt bin ich etwas müde um mich mit diesem perversen Polit- und Profitgierkampf zu beschäftigen, obwohl ich informiere mich schon, gehe abstimmen etc.vielleicht ein kleiner Tropfen auf einen ganz heissen Stein.

    Ganz liebe Grüsse zu dir nach Australien liebe Titania. Bei uns ist endlich der Sommer angekommen. Wir hatten an vielen Tagen Dauerregen und zu kalte Temperaturen für die Jahreszeit.
    Herzlich Elfe

    1. Liebe Elfe; gut von dir zu hoeren. Ja, es geht mir auch so, man wird ein bisschen muede und ja, der Tropfen auf den heissen Stein, aber...steter Tropfen hoehlt den Stein... die EU wurde ja seinerzeit, lange vorher, von den USA angezettelt fuer bessere Kontrolle ueber Europa.
      Vor jedem Krieg waren da Stimmen von den Denkern gegen die Kriegsheini, die ja nie schlafen. Ach wie schoen koennte die Welt sein sein wenn alle friedlich und zufrieden waeren.Der Mensch ist sein groesster Feind. Freu' dich am schoenen Sommer das ist viel besser. Ich habe im Moment auch genug. Es war ja immer so die alten haben "Wisdom" und die Jungen Energie. Bleib gesund und munter wie man so sagt. T.

    2. Danke, du auch liebe Titania-:)